Africa’s Renewable Energy Financing Problem Is Becoming a Bankability Problem
How Currency Risk, Offtake Agreements and Development Finance Are Reshaping Renewable Energy Investment in Africa
Africa’s renewable-energy opportunity has never been more visible.
Across the continent, solar and battery-storage projects are moving from small-scale developments into increasingly large utility-scale investments. But as the size of these projects grows, another question is becoming increasingly important:
Can African energy markets create projects that are bankable enough to attract the scale of international capital required to finance the transition?
The financing structure behind Egypt’s Obelisk solar and battery-storage project provides an important case study.
The project, developed by Scatec, combines 1.1 GW of solar capacity with a 100 MW/200 MWh battery energy storage system. It has attracted financing from major development-finance institutions, including the African Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and British International Investment.
At first glance, the headline is about the hundreds of millions of dollars being mobilised for renewable energy.
But the more important story is the financial architecture behind the project.
The Currency Question
One of the biggest obstacles facing infrastructure investors in emerging markets is currency risk.
A renewable-energy project may generate predictable electricity revenues for 20 or 25 years, but that does not automatically make it a low-risk investment.
If a project earns revenue in a local currency while its debt, equipment costs or shareholder returns are exposed to US dollars or euros, currency depreciation can significantly alter the economics.
This is particularly important in African markets where exchange-rate volatility can be substantial.
The Obelisk project demonstrates how this risk can be addressed through project structuring.
The project is supported by a 25-year US-dollar-denominated power purchase agreement, providing an important layer of revenue certainty for investors and lenders.
This is more than a contractual detail.
It can determine whether a large renewable-energy project is considered investable in the first place.
Bankability May Matter More Than Solar Potential
Africa has some of the world’s best solar resources.
Yet having abundant sunshine does not automatically translate into billions of dollars of investment.
Investors also need confidence in the offtaker.
They need predictable revenue.
They need credible government and regulatory frameworks.
They need access to foreign currency.
They need financing structures capable of absorbing political, currency and market risks.
This is why the next phase of Africa’s renewable-energy expansion may depend less on proving that the continent needs clean electricity and more on proving that projects can generate reliable financial returns.
The distinction is critical.
A project can be technically viable but financially unbankable.
And that gap is one of the biggest barriers between Africa’s enormous renewable-energy potential and actual deployment.
Why Development Finance Institutions Matter
The involvement of institutions such as the African Development Bank, EBRD and BII is therefore significant.
Development-finance institutions do more than provide capital.
Their participation can help reduce perceived project risk and encourage commercial lenders and private investors to participate.
This creates a multiplier effect.
Public and concessional capital can help unlock private capital that might otherwise remain on the sidelines.
For Africa, this is particularly important because the continent’s energy-transition financing requirements are far greater than what public-sector budgets alone can provide.
The challenge is therefore not simply attracting development finance.
It is using development finance strategically to create projects and markets that eventually become capable of attracting substantially more private capital.
Egypt’s Bigger Opportunity
Egypt is emerging as an important market to watch in this regard.
The country has been building a pipeline of large-scale solar, wind and battery-storage projects while developing financing structures designed to attract international investors.
The significance goes beyond individual projects.
If Egypt can demonstrate that large renewable-energy projects can be developed with credible offtake arrangements, long-term contracts and international financing participation, it could strengthen investor confidence in the broader Egyptian energy market.
And that creates a potential feedback loop:
Better project structures → lower perceived risk → more investment → larger project pipeline → stronger renewable-energy market.
This is the kind of cycle other African markets will increasingly need to create.
The Battery Factor
There is another important dimension to the Obelisk project: battery storage.
Africa’s renewable-energy conversation has traditionally focused heavily on generation capacity.
How many megawatts of solar can be installed?
How many gigawatts of wind can be developed?
But as renewable penetration increases, the ability to store and dispatch electricity when it is needed becomes increasingly important.
The combination of solar and battery storage therefore represents a shift in the continent’s energy investment story.
Investors are no longer looking only at renewable generation.
They are increasingly looking at renewable generation plus flexibility.
That could become one of the most important investment themes in Africa’s energy sector over the next decade.
What This Means for African Energy Markets
The lesson from Egypt is not that every African country needs to replicate the exact same financing model.
The lesson is that bankability has to become a central part of energy policy.
Governments seeking to attract renewable-energy investment need to think about the entire investment environment.
Who will buy the electricity?
In what currency?
For how long?
What happens if the local currency depreciates?
Can investors repatriate their returns?
How credible is the regulatory framework?
Can the grid absorb the new generation?
And ultimately, can the project provide affordable electricity while still generating sufficient returns for investors?
These questions may determine which African markets attract the next wave of global energy-transition capital.
Africa does not have a shortage of renewable-energy opportunities.
It has a shortage of sufficiently de-risked, bankable projects at the scale required to transform its electricity systems.
That distinction matters.
The continent’s renewable-energy race may therefore not be won by the country with the most sunlight or the largest project pipeline.
It may be won by the markets that become the easiest, safest and most predictable places to deploy capital.
And that is why the financing structure behind projects such as Obelisk deserves as much attention as the megawatts being built.
Africa’s energy transition is ultimately a capital story—and capital follows bankability.
What do you think is the biggest barrier to renewable-energy investment in Africa: currency risk, offtaker risk, regulation, grid infrastructure, or the cost of capital? We’ll be reading your comments
For inquiry or newsletter sponsorship contact: lumafrikrenewablemedia@gmail.com
Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram
For more industry related news, click here.